Literary Quranic Researches

Literary Quranic Researches

A Taxnomical Analysis of Motion Events in Qur’anic Verbs: A Cognitive Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Qur’an and Hadith, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 MA Sudent pf Qur’an and Hadith, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 MA Student of Qur’an and Hadith, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
Motion events are concepts that occur in the world outside the mind and are often conceptualized by verbs. These events are coded in different ways in different languages. Diversity in the encoding of motion events causes the taxonomic division of languages. This research was carried out based on the representation of the semantic concepts of motion events in the Qur'anic verbs, in order to determine whether the motion events, according to what Talmy (2007) claims, are also true in relation to the Qur'anic verbs or not? In the Holy Qur’an, different types of verbs of motion are used to conceptualize abstract matters such as reward, punishment, reckoning, remembrance, etc. These concepts are sometimes expressed through modal verbs in which the path is conceptualized through the function, and sometimes the path is lexicalized in the verb itself. Satellites in the language of the Qur’an are usually expressed in the form of constructions such as prepostions or other semantic constructions related to the verb. Based on Talmy's cognitive approach, languages ​​are divided into two groups of verb-framed and satellite-framed. In the first group, events related to force dynamics such as path, manner and cause are represented through the verb, and in the second group, they are represented in the form of an orbit around the root of the verb and through the function. The results of this research showed that the taxonomy of Qur'anic verbs is on a continuum of verb-based/satellite-framed, with an inclination of the verbs towards being satellite-framed.
Keywords

  1. ابن منظور، محمد بن کرم (1414ق) لسان العرب، بیروت: دار صادر، چاپ سوم
  2. دبیرمقدم، محمد (1392) رده­شناسی زبانهای ایرانی. تهران: سمت
  3. روشن، بلقیس، اردبیلی، لیلا (1377) مقدمه­ای بر معناشناسی شناختی. تهران: نشر علم
  4. راغب اصـــفهانی، حســـین­بن­محمد (1412ق) المفردات فی غریب القرآن،تحقیق:صـــفوان عدنان داوودی، بیروت: دارالعلم - الدارالشامیه، چاپ اول
  5. سیدان، احمد (1397) "بررسی افعال حرکتی در شرح شطحیات روزبهان با رویکردی شناختی". فصلنامه متن ادب

 فارسی.سال پنجاه و پنجم، دوره جدید، سال یازدهم. شماره اول (پیاپی 14) . صص109-125 .

  1. شاه­حسینی، فائقه (1396) بررسی تطبیقی فعل در زبان­های فارسی میانه و نواز دیدگاه رده­شناسی شناختی. رساله دکتری زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور.
  2. صفوی، کوروش (1384) درآمدی بر معنی‌شناسی. تهران: سازمان تبلیغات اسلامی. پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی
  3. طباطبایی، محمدحسین (1417ق) المیزان فی تفسیرالقرآن، قم: جامعه مدرسین ، چاپ پنجم
    9. طبرسی، فضل­بن­حسن (1372) مجمع­البیان فی تفسیرالقرآن، به کوشش محمدجواد بلاغی، تهران:ناصر خسرو،چاپ سوم
  4. فراهیدی، خلیل بن احمد (1410ق) . کتاب العین، قم: هجرت، چاپ دوم
  5. قرآن کریم با ترجمه مهدی فولادوند، نرم افزار quran.innoor.ir
  6. مسگرخویی، مریم (1392) "بازنمودمسیر در افعال حرکتی فارسی" .ویژه‌نامه‌ فرهنگستان، دستور، ش 9، 74-92
  7. Comrie, B.(1976) . Aspect.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. ___(1989) .Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  9. Cook, V. (1988) . Chomsky’s Universal Grammar. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  10. Croft, W. (1990) .Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. _­­­­___ (1995) Modern Syntactic Typology. In M. Shibatani and T. Bynon (Eds.), pp.85-144.
  12. Croft, W. and D.A. Cruse ) 2003) .Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Dixon, R.M.W. (1979) . Ergativity.Language 55: 59-138.
  14. Evans, V. and M. Green ) 2006) . Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Talmy, L. (1972) . Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi.Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  16. _____. (2000a) Toward a CognitiveSemantics. Vol. l. Cambridge: MIT press.
  17. _____.(2000b) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 2.Cambridge MIT press.
  18. _____.(2007) Lexical Typologies. In: Shopen, T.(ED.) ,language Typology and Syntactic Universals (Vol.3) 2nd edition (pp. 66 –169) Cambridge University press
  19. _____. (2008) . Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In: Guo, Jian-Sheng,et. al. eds. Crosslinguistic Approaches to thePsychology of 29 Language: Research in the

26.Tradition ofDan Isaac Slobin. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  1. _____. (2012) . Main Verb Properties. International Journal of Cognitive.