Literary Quranic Researches

Literary Quranic Researches

Communicative Implicature in Surah Hūd Based on Paul Grice’s Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD student in Arabic Language and Literature - Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran
Abstract
Applied linguistics, as an interdisciplinary field, investigates linguistic elements and textual structures in order to deepen understanding of meaning construction and to uncover implicit and context-dependent meanings. Within the Qur’anic worldview, humanity is inherently dialogic, as Almighty God consistently employs dialogue to communicate truths and human interests. Through prophetic interactions, dialogue is established as the most effective means of idea transmission, conflict resolution, and consensus building. Herbert Paul Grice, the analytic philosopher of language, reflects this dialogic orientation in his formulation of the Cooperative Principle governing conversation, speech acts, and implicature. For Grice, conversation is a purposeful, rational, and cooperative activity governed by four maxims: Quantity, Quality, Relation, and Manner. Contextually motivated and intentional flouting of these maxims gives rise to conversational implicatures. The present study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach to examine selected dialogues in Surah Hūd (ayahs 30–116) through the framework of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. The findings indicate frequent floutings of all four maxims across the analyzed ayahs. In Prophet Noah’s (AS) dialogues with his people, violations of the maxims of Manner, Relation, and Quantity occur at equal rates, whereas violations of the maxim of Quality are least frequent. These pragmatic deviations function not as communicative failures but as strategic rhetorical devices that activate the audience’s rational expectations, generate rich implicatures, reinforce monotheistic urgency, expose obstinacy, and emphasize divine justice. The study thus demonstrates that the Qur’anic discourse skillfully employs maxim flouting in alignment with universal pragmatic principles, affirming dialogue as the optimal medium for conveying transcendent truth.
Keywords

Subjects


- القرآن الکریم
1. اکو،امبرتو، (1383)،«استعاره مبنای تفکر و ابزار زیبایی آفرینی»، به کوشش فرهاد ساسانی، تهران: سوره مهر.
2. آقاگل زاده،فردوس، (1385)، «تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی»، ج1، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
3. روشن،بلقیس و اردبیلی،لیلا، (1392)، «مقدمه ای بر معناشناسی شناختی»، تهران:نشرعلم.
4. شمیسا،سیروس، (1393)،«نگاهی تازه به بدیع»،چاپ پنجم، ویراست سوم، تهران: میترا.
5. صانعی پور، محمد حسن، ( 1390)، «مبانی تحلیل کارگفتی در قرآن کریم»، ج1، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)
6. صفوی،کورش، (1392)،«معنی شناسی کاربردی»، ج2، تهران:انتشارات همشهری.
7. قائمی نیا،علیرضا، (1389)، «بیولوژی نص نشانه شناسی و تفسیر قرآن»، ج1،تهران:سازمان پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.
8. لاینز،جان،(1391)، «درآمدی بر معناشناسی زبان»،ترجمه کوروش صفوی، ج 1،تهران: علمی.
9. مک کاریک، ایرنا ریما، (1385)،« دانش نامۀ نظریه های ادبی معاصر»، ترجمه مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوی، ج2، تهران: آگه.
10. یول،جورج، (1388)،«کاربردشناسی زبان»،ترجمه محمد عموزاده مهدیرجی و منوچهر توانگر، ج3، تهران: سمت.
11. Cutting, (2002), Discourse and Pragmatic,A Resource Book For Students, London and NewYork: Routledge.Francisco and London: Academic Press.
12. Grice,H.P (1975),’’Logic and Conversation’’.In Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3 Speech Acts.Eds, Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, New York, SanFrancisco and London: Academic Press.
13. Grice,H.P.(1975), Utterer’s Meaning,Sentence Meaning and Word Meaning.In foundations of language, internationalJournal of Language and Philosophy, Vol.4, D.Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrech-Holland.
14. Grice,Paul, (1989), Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press.